Math 5615H: News and Announcements, Fall 2015

o 12/24/15, 3 a.m.: I have just submitted the grades. You must be able to see them online within 24 hours. Thank you for a great semester. Happy holidays!

o 12/16/15: Extra office hours before the Final: Thursday 1:30 to 2:25 and 3:30 to 4:30 p.m.

o 12/15/15: The mean on Midterm II was 28.4, which corresponds to 71%, and the median was 27.5. This is slightly better than on the first test.

o 12/13/15: I have finally managed to post the second part of the Sample Final.

o 12/13/15: I had problems with internet connection all day yesterday until now, 12:30 p.m., and have not been able to post the second part of the Sample Final. The internet seems to be working now, so expect Part II of the Sample Final soon, within an hour.

o 12/12/15: I have posted Part I of the Sample Final. Sorry about the delay. I will post Part II later tonight.

o 12/12/15: I have added a solution to Problem 1(3) on Sample Midterm II.

o 12/9/15: I have posted solutions to Problems 1(2) and 3 on Sample Midterm II. Just click on the link to the Sample Midterm.

o 12/7/15: I have also recalled that at some point I said ζ(1) = -1/12, whereas it is actually ζ(-1) = 1 + 2 + 3 + ... = -1/12.

o 12/7/15: Today I called Abel's theorem what was supposed to be called Dirchlet's test, see Theorem 6.4.5. I apologize: I confused it with Abel's lemma, which is what 6.4.4 is.

o 12/6/15: The Sample Midterm Exam II is posted. The best thing to do is to solve it on your own before we discuss it on Wednesday. See more on how to get ready for the test below.

o 12/6/15: Good news: I have removed Section 6.3 from the coverage on both Midterm II and the Final.

o 11/30/15: There is a typo in Problem 5.7.27: you should assume that the limit of g(x) as x approaches b from the left is equal to 0.

o 11/29/15: I have removed the material following 5.7.12 in Section 5.7 from the coverage on Midterm II and the Final. We will not cover it in class. However, in doing the homework due December 2, you will need to read the definitions, the wordings of theorems, and examples 5.7.13-18, skipping the proofs of theorems.

o 11/24/15: James has pointed out another error in the textbook to me: In Problem 5.5.1, the a and b in front of the integrals should have square roots around them. I have also posted an updated Errata file for the textbook on our class web page. The link through the library class page goes to the Errata file on the author's homepage, and that file will be updated only after Thanksgiving.

o 11/23/15: Wes has pointed out another error in the textbook to me: Theorem 5.7.11 makes sense only for b = +∞.

o 11/22/15: Coverage for the Friday, December 18, Final Exam (10:30-12:30 in our regular classroom) is basically all we will have studied from the beginning of the semester through the second midterm. This will be Chapters 1 through 6, skipping the starred sections, Theorem 3.1.11, the material following 5.7.12 in Section 5.7 and Section 6.3. Pay attention to the Errata. Apply the same preparation gidelines as for the upcoming midterm, see below.

o 11/22/15: Coverage for the Friday, December 11, Midterm Exam II (in our regular classroom) is basically all we will have studied between the two midterms through Monday, December 7. This will be Sections 3.5 through 6.4, skipping the starred sections, the material following 5.7.12 in Section 5.7 and Section 6.3. Pay attention to the Errata. How to get ready for the test? The best way would be to try to solve as many problems as you can on your own (opening the textbook when needed, and not timing yourself) from the sample midterm exam, which will be posted soon, the homeworks, and the textbook. For those problems you cannot solve, it may be a good idea to discuss them with your friends, i.e., your study group. Come to my office hours to get hints or other help. Go over homework problems again without consulting your solutions and look for problems from exams in similar classes on the web: search for Analysis tests, exams, midterms, finals, etc., but make sure the class you find is for undergraduates. When you know you can get an idea of how you might approach most of the problems right away, you may feel more sure that you will do well on our exam. Good luck!

o 11/22/15: Homework 10, due Wednesday, December 2, has been posted. This will be our last homework.

o 11/19/15: In Problem 5.3.2, when stating that f' is integrable on [a,b], what is meant is that its continuous extension to [a,b] as per Theorem 3.5.9 is automatically integrable as any continuous function. Please ignore the first part of the problem, which asks you to prove that f' is integrable. This question does not make sense otherwise, because for a function to be integrable on [a,b], it has to be defined at all points of [a,b] -- see the boxed statement in the beginning of Section 5.1 on integrability.

o 11/19/15: Another hint for Problem 5.3.14: It is not at all necessary to use L'Hôpital's rule. There is a pretty simple solution of this problem (which I learned from Raj) that deals with finding a large enough M, so that f(x) is sufficiently close to its limit at ∞, and breaking the integral of f(y)dy from 0 to na into the integrals from 0 to N and from N to na. Since you are concerned with the limits of the integrals divided by n, the contribution of the first integral will be negligible for large n. [This all is pretty frivolous math speak -- of course, when you write up your solution, all these vague words should turn into epsilons, M's and alike.]

o 11/18/15: A hint for Problem 5.3.14: If you are using L'Hôpital's rule, do not forget to make sure that the integrals of f(y)dy from 0 to na have a limit ±∞ as n --> ∞. This actually may not be the case, if lim f(x) = 0 as x --> +∞. In this case, estimate the integral with ± the integral of |f(y)|dy and note that the integral of |f(y)|dy from 0 to na always has a limit, finite or infinite. Find the required limit of the integral of |f(nx)|dx from 0 to a as n --> ∞ in both cases separately.

o 11/16/15: I have made a misprint in the proof of the change of variables theorem today in class. When computing G(φ(b)) as the integral of f(y)dy, I wrote the limits of integration as c to b, whereas it was supposed to be c to d = φ(b). I should also have mentioned explicitly that the image of [a,b] under φ was assumed to be [c,d] in the wording of the theorem.

o 11/13/15, 1:52 a.m.: Homework 9, due Friday, November 20, has been posted.

o 11/9/15: Saurav showed me a simpler way of proving that for an integrable f and a constant c, the function cf is integrable and its integral is c times the integral of f. If you use the fact that for c > 0 and A a subset in R, sup (cA) = c sup A and inf (cA) = c inf A, then sup _S(cf,P) = sup c _S(f,P) = c sup _S(f,P) = c (integral(f dx)). And similarly, for the upper Darboux sums. My argument combined this with the proof of the equation sup(cA) = c sup(A), which is proven using arbitrary ε > 0, whence there were all those ε's.

o 11/7/15, 12:52 a.m.: Homework 8, due Friday, November 13, has been posted.

o 11/6/15: Thinking it over on homework Problem 4.6.4, I believe the only correct way meant to show that the limit in the problem is 0 if Pn = Tn by the author was to apply L'Hôpital's rule, as I presented first in class today. However, I asked the grader not to take points off for an incomplete solution that uses the remainder, should he be grading that problem. BTW, I am still working on the new homework.

o 11/4/15: Homework Problem 4.5.21 contains a misprint not caught on the Errata list: The interval (0,1) should be changed to (-1,1).

o 10/31/15: Homework 7, due Friday, November 6, has been posted. Sorry for the delay.

o 10/26/15: I made two errors in that example of a function whose derivative at 0 is positive but which was not increasing on any neighborhood of 0. The function must be f(x) = x2 sin(1/x) + x/2 for x ≠ 0 (I did not divide by 2 in class), and the suggested values of x and y which show that the function is not increasing must be like 1/2πn and 1/(2πn ± π), rather than 2πn and 2πn ± π. It is also easy to see that the function is not increasing near 0 by computing the derivative f'(x) = 2x sin(1/x) - cos(1/x) + 1/2 at each x ≠ 0 and noticing that around small x where the cosine is near ± 1, there will be intervals on which f' > 0 and f' < 0, respectively. Thus, by the MVT, the function f will be increasing and, respectively, decreasing on those intervals.

o 10/23/15: Homework 6, due Friday, October 30, has been posted.

o 10/19/15: The mean on Midterm I was 26.1 and the median was 27, which corresponds to 67.5%. On the average, you have done a good job for an honors class.

o 10/19/15: The wording of the same Problem 8 in Section 3.4 needs to be corrected to talking about solutions x in (0, +∞)).

o 10/18/15: In Problem 8 in Section 3.4, it is meant use Calculus tools, such as the First or Second Derivative tests. Compare this to the theorem that a function with a bounded derivative is uniformly continuous at the end of the section on uniform continuity in the text. (We will talk about it on Monday, time permitting.) It sounds like we are making a closed circle by using the material we have not studied yet. Sometimes, we do such things, when the focus of the problem is pretty far away from the tools you would like to use.

o 10/17/15: Homework 5, due Friday, October 23, has been posted.

o 10/12/15: I have removed stuff after Theorem 3.5.6 from the coverage on Midterm I. I do not plan to cover it in class at any time but will leave it for your reading after the midterm.

o 10/11/15: The Sample Midterm exam is posted. The best thing to do is to solve it on your own before we discuss it on Wednesday. See more on how to get ready for the test below.

o 10/11/15: I have added a paragraph on Cardinality (page 508) to the coverage for Midterm I. Chapters 1-3 assume its knowledge, anyway, for instance in the theorem on the countability of the set of discontinuities of a monotone function in Section 3.3.

o 10/10/15: I have removed Theorem 3.1.11 from the coverage for Midterm I. Even though it is now corrected in the Errata, it does not make sense a Cauchy Criterion and can safely be skipped.

o 10/9/15: I have adjusted the coverage for Midterm I once again, removing Chapter 4 from it whatsoever.

o 10/8/15: I have adjusted the coverage for Midterm I, removing Section 4.2 from it.

o 10/8/15: Hint to Problem 3.1.2: Try to use sequences. If q is an accumulation point for a set of reals, then there is a sequence of distinct points in the set converging to q. Try to analyze how many terms 2/m this sequence may have and how many terms 3/n it might have. Play with subsequences of that sequence to restrict the places they may converge to.

o 10/6/15: Coverage for the Friday, October 16, Midterm Exam I (in our regular classroom) is basically all we will have studied through Monday, October 12. This will be Chapters 1-3 through 3.5.6 and Cardinality (class notes and page 508), skipping Theorem 3.1.11 and Section 3.2. How to get ready for the test? The best way would be to try to solve as many problems as you can on your own (opening the textbook when needed, and not timing yourself) from the sample midterm exam, which will be posted soon, the homeworks, and the textbook. For those problems you cannot solve, it may be a good idea to discuss them with your friends, i.e., your study group. Come to my office hours to get hints or other help. Go over homework problems again without consulting your solutions and look for problems from exams in similar classes on the web: search for Analysis tests, exams, midterms, finals, etc., but make sure the class you find is for undergraduates. When you know you can get an idea of how you might approach most of the problems right away, you may feel more sure that you will do well on our exam. Good luck!

o 10/5/15: I have added a link to the list of errata for the text to our main course page.

o 10/2/15: Warning: the Cauchy Criterion for functions, Theorem 3.1.11, is not true! Here is a challenge: find an error in the proof. Moreover, you may wish to find a counterexample. Then show me what you have got.

o 9/25/15: Homework 3, due Friday, October 2, has been posted.

o 9/23/15: Starting from this Friday, I have decided to modify my office hours slightly and start them at 11:15 on Wednesday and at 10:10 on Friday. Thus, my office hours from now on will be Mon 11:15-12:05, Wed 11:15-12:05, Fri 10:10-11:00, or by appointment.

o 9/21/15: If you have a question to the grader, you may send a message to him at yeoxx038@umn.edu. If you need to see him, make an appointment. His name is Yao-Rui Yeo.

o 9/18/15: Homework 2, due Friday, September 25, has been posted. Reminder: If you turn in your homework after the beginning, penalty will be assessed after the second occurrence.

o 9/17/15: For homework Problem 1.2.1(e) assume also that c ≠ 0, something just overlooked by the author of the text.

o 9/16/15: Some problems ask to prove a statement related to supremum and infimum, and the proofs for each case are very similar. You may just prove one of them, say, the case of the supremum, and then write a single sentence saying that the proof for the infimum is similar, without repeating the details of the proof.

9/16/15: For the homework problem involving Q( 2 ), you may assume that  2  and even  3  exist in R, even though it would also make sense to solve it within Q( 2 ) only. Indeed, it may be done like Problems A and B on this homework, but there is no need to practice that again for this problem, especially given that it already assumes that  2  exists.

o 9/16/15: I have expanded the comment before Problems A and B on Homework 1, so as to explain more clearly why it makes sense to impose that nasty constraint on you that you are not allowed to use the reals and in particular  2 .

o 9/14/15: Another student has pointed out to me that the square root  2  of 2 was printing on Homework 1 as just 2. I have corrected the typo.

o 9/14/15: One of the students has pointed out to me that my argument that p 2 /q is irrational had to assume that p/q ≠ 0. This is certainly true, as it involved division by p/q. If it happens that p/q such that a/ 2  < p/q < b/ 2  is actually zero, use density of the rationals again and find another rational r such that a/ 2  < 0 < r < b/ 2 .

o 9/14/15: I have posted the first Homework, due Friday, September 18. It will be collected or graded. Making sure to do homework on your own will be the best way to get ready for the exams. Getting together with other students (that is, in study groups) is a very effective way to do homework. Your friend is your TA. :-)

o 9/6/15: I am out of town, participating in a workshop on Braids, Configuration Spaces and Quantum Topology at the University of Tokyo, Japan, during the first week of classes at the U, through September 12. I have asked Professor Westerland to substitute for me in my Wednesday and Friday classes. No office hours during the first week, either: if you need to contact me, please write me at voronov@umn.edu . I apologize about starting the term with being away. I look forward to meeting you and teaching the class!

o 9/6/15: I recommend the following way to study for this class. Attend each class, take notes, participate in class actively. After each class review your notes and study the corresponding part of the text. You can find out which part of the text at the Class Outlines page. Then do the assigned homework problems pertinent to that material. Some students find it helpful to read the material before it is covered in class, some prefer to do reading after class.

o 9/6/15: If you need to register for this class, please, send a message to Ms. Lawson at ugrad@math.umn.edu and ask for a permission number. If permission is granted, go to OneStop and register.


Last modified: (2018-10-07 23:46:40 CDT)