Attractors

Notations for this section.

The following definition is a modification to this setting of that given by Conley [2,3] for flows on compact metric spaces.

Definition: A set Attractors1.jpg is an attractor for Attractors2.jpg if

Some authors would call Attractors7.jpg an "attracting set" and would reserve the name "attractor" for an attracting set with further properties. However, in this paper Conley's terminology will be followed.

The preceeding definition is somewhat weak in the sense that the only assumption on the neighborhood Attractors8.jpg is that Attractors9.jpg . However, this assumption is actually very strong. For example, the neighborhood Attractors10.jpg can be taken to be compact, positively invariant [More], and arbitrarily close to Attractors11.jpg , as stated in Theorem 2.1 below. Also, the notion of attractor corresponds to the more classical notion of "asymptotically stable" [More].

We have the following theorem:

Theorem 2.1 If Attractors12.jpg is a nonempty compact invariant set, then the following statements are equivalent.

Proof.

The next important notion is the domain of attraction [More].

The following theorems establish that the domain of attraction of Attractors27.jpg , Attractors28.jpg is an open set and that every compact subset Attractors29.jpg of Attractors30.jpg satisfies Attractors31.jpg .

Theorem 2.2 If Attractors32.jpg is a compact positively invariant neighborhood of an attractor Attractors33.jpg such that Attractors34.jpg , then

Attractors35.jpg

and hence Attractors36.jpg is open.

Proof.

Theorem 2.3 If Attractors37.jpg is an attractor and if Attractors38.jpg is a compact subset of Attractors39.jpg , then Attractors40.jpg .

Proof.


[Left] Back to Introduction
[Right] Attractor blocks
[Up] Main entry point

[TOC] [Glossary] [Help]


Copyright (c) 1998 by Richard McGehee, all rights reserved.
Last modified: July 31, 1998.