The Cayley surface: the equation of the dual surface (continuation)

This page is dedicated in memory of my friend Sevín Recillas,
who got me interested in this surface.


 
 
 
 
 
 
Scroll down
 
to the
 
continued discussion
 
of the dual equation.
    Viewing hints:
 
  • This is a large figure and it simply may load slowly. So, the first thing to try is just to be patient for a little while.
     
  • If nothing loads except the light blue background, it may help to (i) click on your browser's "back" button, and then (ii) click on the "forward" button to get back to this page.
     
  • If the picture absolutely won't load, please click on the Static figure link.
  • Implicit equation links: Other Cayley surface links: Other:  

    The equations of the Cayley surface and of the dual surface:
     
        The approach used here is an extension of what I have learned from Sevín Recillas.  Some choices of emphasis are recent, but I have stayed fairly close to methods that Sevín and I discussed in Morelia.

        In the previous discussion, we obtained the following version of the implicit equation of the dual surface :
     
          64wxyz = (w² + x² + y² + z² - 2wx - 2wy - 2wz - 2xy - 2xz - 2yz.
     
    As I noted in a previous page, this equation (i) is symmetric in the variables w,x,y,z and (ii) clearly exhibits fact that each of the coordinate planes intersects the dual surface (with multiplicity = 2) in a plane conic curve. 

        In this page I will present a change of coordinates that yields a version of the implicit equation which exhibits the singular locus much more directly.  I will initially use a set of variables which is not completely symmetric:
     
          a = w + x     b = w - x;     c = y + z;     d = y - z.
     
    As linear combinatons of  w,x,y,z  the variables  a,b,c,d  are linearly independent.  {We are not considering fields of characteristic 2.}  With these variables, we have  4wx = a² - b²  and   4yz = c² - d²,  while:
     
          w² + x² + y² + z² - 2wx - 2wy - 2wz - 2xy - 2xz - 2yz = b² +d² -2ac.
     
    Therefore, we have the following version of the implicit equation:
     
          4(a² - b²)(c² - d²) = (b² + d² -2ac)²,
    or:
          4a²c² + 4b²d² - 4a²d² - 4b²c² = (b² + d²)² - 4ac(b² + d²) + 4a²c².
     
    One obvious cancellation is possible here; if we do this cancellation and also subtract  4b²d²  from both sides of the equation, then we obtain a fairly short version of the implicit equation:
     
          - 4a²d² - 4b²c² = (b² - d²)² - 4ac(b² + d²)

        Now, the plane  b + d = 0  (or equivalently  w - x + y - z = 0)  contains two of the three lines that compose the singular locus of the dual surface, specifically  w=x,  y=z  and  w=z,  x=y.  Similarly, the plane  b - d = 0  (or equivalently  w - x - y + z = 0)  contains the lines w=x,  y=z  and  w=y,  x=z.  This suggests that  b and d are appropriate variables to use in a coordinate system that relates naturally to the singular locus of the dual surface.  Indeed, the first term on the right side of our implicit equation is equal to  (b + d)²(b - d)². 

        Another variable with a similar property is  a - c = w + x - y - z.  We can introduce this variable into the equation by adding  2(a² + c²)(b² + d²)  to both sides of the implicit equation, as follows:
     
          2(a² - c²)(b² - d²) = (b² - d²)² + 2(a - c)²(b² + d²)
    or:
          2(a² - c²)(b² - d²) = (b + d)²(b - d)² + (a - c)²(b + d)² + (a - c)²(b - d)². 

        Our final change of variables can now be introduced:

    • W = a + c = w + x + y + z;
    • X = a - c = w + x - y - z;
    • Y = b + d = w - x + y - z;
    • Z = b - d = w - x - y + z.
    In terms of these variables, the implicit equation of the dual surface looks like this:
     
          2WYXZ = X²Y² + X²Z² + X²Y². 
     
    As I will explain in a forthcoming webpage, this is a known form of the equation of the Steiner surface.

        We also should note that the variables  W,X,Y,Z  are linearly independent as linear combinations of  a,b,c,d  and therefore also as linear combinations of  w,x,y,z.  Alternatively, the change of variables from  w,x,y,z  to  W,X,Y,Z  is accomplished (in either direction up to a scalar multiple) by the following matrix:
     
               1     1      1     1
               1     1     -1    -1
               1    -1      1    -1
               1    -1     -1     1
     
    Indeed, if we multiply this matrix by ½, we obtain a symmetric orthogonal matrix. 

     


    The Java files used in this page were downloaded from the Geometry Center webpage.
    I generated the geometric data for this figure in March 2009.
    Latest updates May 15, 2018.

    Prof. Joel Roberts
    School of Mathematics
    University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, MN 55455
    USA

    Office: 109B Vincent Hall

    e-mail: roberts@math.umn.edu

    http://www.math.umn.edu/~roberts